|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2064
   |
Posted - 2015.03.08 22:36:34 -
[1] - Quote
Lictas Alice wrote:If it was only solo players vs larger gangs using links , i wouldn't mind. But in my experience , its usually people in faction ships/full set of implants/ with backup/ with links at a 100% safe place( generally FW zones). Or for example in HS , Sit a links boat in a NPC corp get a pretty safe advantage with no risk. It gives people another advantage that can't really be countered , which is why it should be changed.
Logi? Focus them . Ecm? Use eccm Neuts? Cap boosters/nos Links??
Neutral links being on grid in highsec wouldn't affect them in any way whatsoever, they'd still not be legal targets.
If you wanted to change how links are employed in highsec you'd have to mess with crimewatch.
If you really want to open up that particular can of worms again that's fine by me, I mean they did such a great job last time. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2066
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 03:08:50 -
[2] - Quote
Lictas Alice wrote:I know , i kinda hinted at that a few posts earlier. If they can't implement on grid links , i am pretty sure theres other things they could do. Links on kilmails would be great , all those 'solo' pilots that need links to win would be exposed and probbably stop using them
Again this wouldn't have any affect on their use in highsec.
When you need links in highsec it's usually because you intend to engage a numerically superior but otherwise inferior opponent and that extra advantage. The numbers of people involved in your kills is irrelevant and losing the element of surprise after their first use is much the same as it is with neutral logistics except with links they are never actually vulnerable.
The logical solution is to give neutral characters that are providing fleet bonuses to characters who are suspect flagged, involved in limited engagements, or are engaging war targets suspect flags.
It sounds like a great idea right? I guarantee it wouldn't work out how people want it to, much like suspect flagging of neutral logistics had a number of funny side effects that routinely screw over the uninformed. |
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
2071
|
Posted - 2015.03.10 05:08:58 -
[3] - Quote
No! Nerf all the things I don't like, even if the reason I don't like them is because I don't know how they work! |
|
|
| |
|